A Pro-Gun Group in Virginia Just Launched a Fight to Stop the ATF

Without a single action from Congress, the ATF just moved to ban bump stocks nationwide.

To make this happen the agency has made some legally questionable moves.

Now, a grassroots pro-gun group in Virginia is starting to fight back.

VCDL Joins Federal Lawsuit Against the ATF’s Bump Stock Ban

The Virginia Citizens’ Defense League (VCDL) announced they are joining the case to fight the ATF’s bump stock ban.

The lawsuit was originally filed by the Gun Owners of America (GOA).

Now, both pro-gun groups are together seeking an injunction to protect gun owners from the sudden bump stock prohibition and to prevent hundreds of thousands of Americans from facing criminal charges.

“They’re trying to make a new law, and they can’t do that; that’s for Congress” VCDL President Philip Van Cleave told New Virginia Press.

Beyond the action itself, Van Cleave was appalled at the retroactive nature of the policy.

“Too bad you bought a product when it was legal. Now [the ATF is] going to take that away without giving you a penny in return”. Van Cleave explained. “We can’t let them get away with that”.

GOA attacks Bump Stock Ban as Illegal

Earlier this week, the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco Firearms and Explosives (ATF) took a legally dubious step towards banning bump stocks.

Without the authority to create law, the ATF had to develop an opinion to maintain legal credibility for its actions.

To do so, the ATF announced they will classify bump stocks as machineguns, which are already prohibited in many cases.

This effectively bans bump stocks with the threat of criminal penalties if Americans don’t comply.

That leaves hundreds of thousands of Americans at risk of criminal charges for possessing what was a legal accessory at the time.

“An estimated half a million bump stock owners will have the difficult decision of either destroying or surrendering their valuable property – or else risk felony prosecution” stated Eric Pratt, executive director of Gun Owners of America.

Pratt is also concerned that this might amount to a slippery slope.

The fear is that if the ATF implements this bump stock ban without major resistance, they may use it as a stepping stone to take action against other accessories and eventually semi-automatic weapons themselves.

“The new ATF regulations would arbitrarily redefine bump stocks as ‘machineguns’ — and, down the road, could implicate the right to own AR-15’s and many other lawfully owned semi-automatic firearms” stated Pratt.

“ATF’s new bump stock regulation clearly violates federal law, as bump stocks do not qualify as machineguns under the federal statute.”

Currently the ATF has received well over 65,000 comments opposing the ban but has shown no sign of slowing its enforcement timeline.

At the time of this writing, the ATF rule change has been signed by the acting Attorney General and is scheduled to take effect in about 90 days

What do you think?

Does the new ATF ruling follow federal law?

Or does this move violate the Constitution?

Leave your thoughts in the comments section below.

1 2 3

Exit mobile version